Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive from 2022 July
    • Archive 1960 to 2022 June
    • Accepted Articles
    • Published Ahead-of-Print
    • Supplement
  • About
  • For Authors
  • Podcasts

Severe hypoxaemia can predict unfavourable clinical outcomes in individuals with pulmonary embolism aged over 40 years

< Back to Listing

Share this Article

Singapore Med J 2014; 55(9): 483-487; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2014118
Severe hypoxaemia can predict unfavourable clinical outcomes in individuals with pulmonary embolism aged over 40 years

  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • References

Souza CS, Resende FS, Rodrigues MP
Correspondence: Prof Dr Marcelo Palmeira Rodrigues, pmarcelo27@gmail.com

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is an urgent clinical condition that can progress in a wide variety of ways. Therefore, we sought to develop an easy-to-apply algorithm, to be based on readily available clinical indicators, effective in predicting unfavourable outcomes.
METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study based on systematically collected data in a database. The study included 102 patients with APE who were admitted to a tertiary care hospital. The following outcomes were defined as unfavourable: shock, the need for mechanical ventilation, the use of thrombolytics, and death. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore variables significantly associated with outcome and to calculate post-test probabilities.
RESULTS The prevalence of unfavourable outcomes was 25.5% (26 of the 102 patients with APE). The risk of an unfavourable outcome was reduced to 7.0% for patients with APE who were aged ≤ 40 years. In patients with APE who were aged > 40 years, the presence of hypoxaemia (i.e. peripheral oxygen saturation < 90%) alone increased the risk of an unfavourable outcome to 57.0%. A recent history of trauma and the presence of pre-existing lung or heart disease were significantly associated with unfavourable outcomes. The inclusion of those variables in the logistic regression model increased the post-test risk of an unfavourable outcome to 65.0%–86.0%.
CONCLUSION Advanced age (i.e. > 40 years), the presence of hypoxaemia, a recent history of trauma and the presence of pre-existing lung or heart disease are risk factors for unfavourable outcome in patients with APE.

Keywords: anoxia, logistic models, prognosis, pulmonary embolism, wounds and injuries
Singapore Med J 2014; 55(9): 483-487; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2014118

http://smj.org.sg/sites/default/files/5509/5509a4.pdf

REFERENCES

1. Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE. Estimated case fatality rate of pulmonary embolism, 1979 to 1998. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93:1197-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.058
 
2. van der Bijl N, Klok FA, Huisman MV, et al. Measurement of right and left ventricular function by ECG-synchronized CT scanning in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: usefulness for predicting short-term outcome. Chest 2011; 140:1008-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-3174
 
3. Kukla P, D?ugopolski R, Krupa E, et al. Electrocardiography and prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Cardiol J 2011; 18:648-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.2011.0028
 
4. Sanchez O, Trinquart L, Caille V, et al. Prognostic factors for pulmonary embolism: the prep study, a prospective multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181:168-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200906-0970OC
 
5. Ozsu S, Karaman K, Mentese A, et al. Combined risk stratification with computerized tomography /echocardiography and biomarkers in patients with normotensive pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2010; 126:486-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2010.08.021
 
6. Vuilleumier N, Le Gal G, Verschuren F, et al. Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification in non-massive pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7:391-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03260.x
 
7. Kjaergaard J, Schaadt BK, Lund JO, Hassager C. Prognostic importance of quantitative echocardiographic evaluation in patients suspected of first non-massive pulmonary embolism. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10:89-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jen169
 
8. Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, et al. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172:1041-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200506-862OC
 
9. Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170:1383-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.199
 
10. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet 1999; 353:1386-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07534-5
 
11. Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:169?75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.2.169
 
12. Volschan A, Albuquerque D, Tura BR, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism. Arq Bras Cardiol 2009; 93:135-40.
PMid:19838490
 
13. Manier G, Castaing Y. Influence of cardiac output on oxygen exchange in acute pulmonary embolism. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145:130-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/145.1.130
 
14. Manier G, Castaing Y. Contribution of multiple inert gas elimination technique to pulmonary medicine--4. Gas exchange abnormalities in pulmonary vascular and cardiac disease. Thorax 1994; 49:1169-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.49.11.1169
 
15. Wicki J, Perrier A, Perneger TV, Bounameaux H, Junod AF. Predicting adverse outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a risk score. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84:548-52.
PMid:11057848
 
16. Kucher N, Rossi E, De Rosa M, Goldhaber SZ. Massive pulmonary embolism. Circulation 2006; 113:577-82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.592592
 
17. Uresandi F, Otero R, Cayuela A, et al. [A clinical prediction rule for identifying short-term risk of adverse events in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism]. Arch Bronconeumol 2007; 43:617-22. Spanish.
PMid:17983546
 
18. Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A, et al. The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1240-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199205073261902
 
19. Sam A, Sánchez D, Gómez V, et al. The shock index and the simplified PESI for identification of low-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 2011; 37:762-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00070110
 
20. Laporte S, Mismetti P, Décousus H, et al. Clinical predictors for fatal pulmonary embolism in 15,520 patients with venous thromboembolism: findings from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE) Registry. Circulation 2008; 117:1711-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.726232
 
21. Conget F, Otero R, Jiménez D, et al. Short-term clinical outcome after acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100:937-42.
PMid:18989541
×

Around the Site

Home

About SMJ

For Reviewers

Sign Up for Alerts

Issues

Current Issue

All Issues

Online First

Supplement

CME

For Authors

Instructions for Authors

Submit Manuscript


Follow us on:
        

More Links

Contact Us

Copyright

Advertise

SMJ Forms

Privacy Policy

SMA Home

Copyright 2021. Singapore Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.