Share this Article
We would like to comment on the case report “A rare haemoglobin variant (Hb Phnom Penh) manifesting as a falsely high haemoglobin A1c value on ion-exchange chromatography” by Chen and Tai.(1) Interference of a haemoglobin (Hb) variant in the measurement of HbA1C is a common problem in endemic areas with haemoglobinopathy, such as Southeast Asian countries.(2) Several Hb variants have been reported for their interference effect on HbA1c measurement.(2) Chen and Tai suggested that “cautious inspection of the chromatogram may provide a valuable clue to the presence of an Hb variant”.(1) In reality, however, this is very difficult and impractical, since the interfering Hb variant usually leads to chromatograms with results mimicking high HbA1c values. Therefore, measuring HbA1c values in the follow-up of a diabetic patient in an endemic region can be problematic. To determine the HbA1c values of diabetic patients in these regions (i.e. endemic regions with haemoglobinopathy cases), an alternative test, such as one that tests for levels of fructosamine, is recommended.(2,3) Nevertheless, the interpretation of HbA1c values depends on the assays used, and not all assays are dependent on Hb variants.(2) Should HbA1c analysis be required, a standard reference technique such as liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry should be considered.(4)
Sim Sai Tin1, Viroj Wiwanitkit2
1Shantou Medical Center, Shantou, 2Hainan Medical University, China. firstname.lastname@example.org
|1. Chen CF, Tai YK. A rare haemoglobin variant (Hb Phnom Penh) manifesting as a falsely high haemoglobin A1c value on ion-exchange chromatography. Singapore Med J 2014; 55:e126-8.
|2. Wiwanitkit V. Problem of using hemoglobin A1C measurement in endemic area of hemoglobinopathy. Prim Care Diabetes 2007; 1:173-5.
|3. Behan KJ, Merschen J. HbA1c does not always estimate average glucose. Clin Lab Sci 2011; 24:71-7.
|4. Jaisson S, Leroy N, Desroches C, et al. Interference of the most frequent haemoglobin variants on quantification of HbA1c: comparison between the LC-MS (IFCC reference method) and three routinely used methods. Diabetes Metab 2013; 39:363-9.