Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive from 2022 July
    • Archive 1960 to 2022 June
    • Accepted Articles
    • Published Ahead-of-Print
    • Supplement
  • About
  • For Authors
  • Podcasts

Public perceptions of the factors that constitute a good healthcare system

< Back to Listing

Share this Article

Singapore Med J 2009; 50(10): 982-989
Public perceptions of the factors that constitute a good healthcare system

  • Abstract
  • PDF

Joshi VD, Chen YM, Lim JFY
Correspondence: Dr Veena Dhanajay Joshi, veena.d.joshi@singhealth.com.sg

ABSTRACT
Introduction
In Singapore, few studies have been done on the factors that the general public considers to be most important in the healthcare system. We conducted this pilot study to determine the factor structure, reliability and validity of statements in a healthcare survey questionnaire as predictors of public perception of a good healthcare system.
Methods Data on public perceptions of healthcare from a national survey of 1,434 adult Singaporeans was analysed using a principal component analysis and regression, to obtain the factors and predictors. The survey employed 31 statements on healthcare quality, cost, access and the role of the individual vis-à-vis society, which participants ranked on a five-point Likert scale.
Results The exploratory factor analysis identified six critical factors (F): National healthcare financing framework (F1), Service at public institutions (F2), Service at private institutions (F3), Individual responsibility for health (F4), Affordability at public institutions (F5), and Affordability at private institutions (F6). These factors explained 54 percent of variance, and Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.5 to 0.72, except for F1. Regression analysis showed an association of public perception of good healthcare in Singapore with the following factors: F2 (odds ratio [OR] 1.79, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 1.48–2.16, p-value is less than 0.0001); F3 (OR 1.29, 95 percent CI 1.10–1.52, p-value is less than 0.0001); F5 (OR 1.52, 95 percent CI 1.27–1.83, p-value is less than 0.0001); F1 (OR 1.31, 95 percent CI 1.08–1.59, p-value is 0.01); F4 (OR 1.33, 95 percent CI 1.16–1.54, p-value is less than 0.0001); but not with F6.
Conclusion This pilot study provides a practical, reliable and valid first perception second level matrix to assess the Singapore healthcare system. Further snapshot surveys to assess perceptions of the healthcare system should be conducted with questionnaires abridged to include only these five identified critical factors.

Keywords: healthcare system, Singapore healthcare system
Singapore Med J 2009; 50(10): 982-989

http://smj.org.sg/sites/default/files/5010/5010a6.pdf
×

Around the Site

Home

About SMJ

For Reviewers

Sign Up for Alerts

Issues

Current Issue

All Issues

Online First

Supplement

CME

For Authors

Instructions for Authors

Submit Manuscript


Follow us on:
        

More Links

Contact Us

Copyright

Advertise

SMJ Forms

Privacy Policy

SMA Home

Copyright 2021. Singapore Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.