Skip to main content
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Online First
    • Supplement
    • CME
  • About
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submission Fee
    • Submit Manuscript
  • Podcasts

Are all troponin assays equivalent in the emergency department?

< Back to Listing

Share this Article

Singapore Med J 2005; 46(7): 325-327
Are all troponin assays equivalent in the emergency department?

  • Abstract
  • PDF

A Eisenman, V Rusetski, D Avital, J Stolero, T Snitkovsky
Correspondence: Dr Arie Eisenman, eisenman@naharia.health.gov.il

ABSTRACT
Introduction
 Cardiac-specific troponins (cTn) are recently-introduced, sensitive and specific markers of myocardial injury, and their absence should allow to safely exclude a coronary event. Various assays are commercially available but the relative advantage of each is not clear. Our objective was to compare the reliability of the two most commonly used troponin assays (cTnI and cTnT), in the emergency department (ED) for clinical decision when myocardial infarction (MI) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is suspected.
Methods This prospective study included all patients arriving at the ED over a six-month period with chest pain or symptoms suggesting MI or ACS, in which diagnosis could not be confirmed due to absence of characteristic ECG features. All patients were tested with at least one of the two troponin assays available at the ED.
Results Of the 54 included patients, ten (19%) were eventually diagnosed with MI/ACS. Qualitative assays for cTnI and cTnT identified the MI/ACS patients by both assays (respective positive predictive values of 0.5 and 0.7, and negative predictive values of 1.0 and 0.9). However, these assays were only partially correlated (R equals 0.49) and differed significantly. The quantitative assay for cTnI, but not for cTnT, discerned those who had MI/ACS (group A) from those who had other condition (group B) by their troponin levels (MI/ACS - 17.2 plus or minus 23.8 ng/ml versus others - 0.37 plus or minus 0.91 ng/ml, p is less than 0.001).
Conclusion In the ED, bedside assays of troponins are invaluable tools for the clinician, and their use is cost-effective. However, in the recommended cutoffs levels, only troponin I but not troponin T allowed the safe discharge of patients not requiring acute hospital care.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, troponin I, troponin T
Singapore Med J 2005; 46(7): 325-327

http://smj.org.sg/sites/default/files/4607/4607a2.pdf
×
POPULAR THIS MONTH
Managing unhealthy alcohol use in general practice
Controversies and discrepancies in the effect of dietary fat and cholesterol on cardiovascular risk
Clinics in diagnostic imaging (209)
A retrospective review of trampoline-related injuries presenting to a paediatric emergency department in Singapore

Around the Site

Home

About SMJ

For Reviewers

Sign Up for Alerts

Issues

Current Issue

All Issues

Online First

Supplement

CME

For Authors

Instructions for Authors

Submit Manuscript


Follow us on:
        

More Links

Contact Us

Copyright

Advertise

SMJ Forms

Privacy Policy

SMA Home

Copyright 2021. Singapore Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.